🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major awards ceremony approaches, there’s always a clamor for introducing of new categories to recognize overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of followers with niche passions.

A fellow writer has already made supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. So would strategy board titles, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front since similar to blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal stands as crucial and significant. This is the request: We need a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and it will always generate discussions and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why film award organizations avoid this approach. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of video games, that demonstrate such variety they barely qualify one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these six categories actually cover many game types, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for puzzle games. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Think about these outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: structural challenges from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• An iconic brain-teaser wasn’t nominated in any category in 2014
• Another imaginative release missed out in 2019
• A beloved organization game was overlooked in 2021
• Just some puzzle games scraped into niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're small games, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Well-known matching games stand as the most-played games worldwide and have been for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience rivals famous sandbox experiences competing to become most purchased experience; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, while interacting across multiple categories.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these include experiences that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary game development, creating some of essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay 35 years.