🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.